↓ Skip to main content

Applications of a vacuum-actuated multi-material hybrid soft gripper: lessons learnt from RoboSoft manipulation challenge

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applications of a vacuum-actuated multi-material hybrid soft gripper: lessons learnt from RoboSoft manipulation challenge
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2024.1356692
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saikrishna Dontu, Elgar Kanhere, Thileepan Stalin, Audelia Gumarus Dharmawan, Chidanand Hegde, Jiangtao Su, Xiaodong Chen, Shlomo Magdassi, Gim Song Soh, Pablo Valdivia Y. Alvarado

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2024.
All research outputs
#23,329,271
of 25,997,855 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#1,784
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,937
of 146,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,997,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 146,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.