You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How did COVID-19 pandemic affect the older adults’ needs for robot technologies in Japan?: comparison of participatory design workshops during versus after the COVID-19 pandemic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, June 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frobt.2024.1363243 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takanori Komatsu, Marlena R. Fraune, Katherine M. Tsui, Shogo Suda, Mizuki Kobayashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2024.
All research outputs
#15,559,922
of 26,078,244 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#764
of 1,803 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,814
of 149,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,078,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,803 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,214 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.