↓ Skip to main content

Handheld robotic device for endoscopic neurosurgery: system integration and pre-clinical evaluation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Robotics and AI, June 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Handheld robotic device for endoscopic neurosurgery: system integration and pre-clinical evaluation
Published in
Frontiers in Robotics and AI, June 2024
DOI 10.3389/frobt.2024.1400017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanouil Dimitrakakis, George Dwyer, Nicola Newall, Danyal Z. Khan, Hani J. Marcus, Danail Stoyanov

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2024.
All research outputs
#21,319,323
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#1,453
of 1,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,468
of 206,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Robotics and AI
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 206,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.