The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Developing oral health services for people experiencing severe and multiple disadvantage: a case study from Southwest England
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Oral Health, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/froh.2024.1283861 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Martha Paisi, Lyndsey Withers, Rebecca Anderson, Janine Doughty, Lisa Griffiths, Ben Jameson, Elizabeth Murphy, Afsha Musa, Abigail Nelder, Shona Rogers, Robert Witton |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,583,940
of 26,599,665 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Oral Health
#94
of 467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,714
of 345,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Oral Health
#3
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,599,665 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.