The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis design for interventions to prevent children's oral disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Oral Health, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/froh.2024.1428638 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joanne Spetz, Johnie Rose, James G. Kahn, Tracy Lin, Douglas Levy, Oksana Pugach, Susan Hyde, Belinda Borrelli, Michelle Henshaw, Molly Martin, Suchitra Nelson, Francisco Ramos-Gomez, Stuart A. Gansky |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2024.
All research outputs
#20,747,448
of 26,352,576 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Oral Health
#220
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,596
of 139,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Oral Health
#4
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,352,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.