You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Khuluma: Using Participatory, Peer-Led and Digital Methods to Deliver Psychosocial Support to Young People Living With HIV in South Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Reproductive Health, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frph.2021.687677 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Millicent Atujuna, Nikita Simpson, Malebo Ngobeni, Tebogo Monese, Danielle Giovenco, Carey Pike, Zuzana Figerova, Maretha Visser, Maurice Biriotti, Anna Kydd, Linda-Gail Bekker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 15% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,831,679
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Reproductive Health
#36
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,589
of 436,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Reproductive Health
#6
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.