The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Is there any truth in the myth that IVF treatments involve weight gain?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Reproductive Health, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frph.2023.1327110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bozhena Saar-Ryss, Michael Shilo, Michael Friger, Leonti Grin, Yulia Michailov, Simion Meltcer, Svetlana Zaks, Jacob Rabinson, Tal Lazer, Shevach Friedler |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,452,106
of 25,134,448 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Reproductive Health
#230
of 377 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,514
of 165,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Reproductive Health
#7
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,134,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 377 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.