↓ Skip to main content

Geometric modeling of phase ordering for the isotropic–smectic A phase transition

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Soft Matter, May 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Geometric modeling of phase ordering for the isotropic–smectic A phase transition
Published in
Frontiers in Soft Matter, May 2024
DOI 10.3389/frsfm.2024.1359128
Authors

David Uriel Zamora Cisneros, Ziheng Wang, Noémie-Manuelle Dorval Courchesne, Matthew J. Harrington, Alejandro D. Rey

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#17,740,283
of 26,004,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Soft Matter
#17
of 84 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,016
of 170,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Soft Matter
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,004,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 84 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them