The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Highly sensitised individuals present a distinct Treg signature compared to unsensitised individuals on haemodialysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Transplantation, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/frtra.2023.1165320 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Dudreuilh, S. Basu, O. Shaw, H. Burton, N. Mamode, F. Harris, T. Tree, P. Nedyalko, M. Terranova-Barberio, G. Lombardi, C. Scottà, A. Dorling |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| India | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2023.
All research outputs
#7,078,079
of 26,450,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Transplantation
#5
of 51 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,585
of 374,558 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Transplantation
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,450,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 51 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 374,558 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them