The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Lights and shadows on local recurrence after renal surgery: when, why and how to manage
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Urology, May 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fruro.2024.1419418 |
| Authors |
Luca Di Gianfrancesco, Alessandro Crestani, Antonio Amodeo, Paolo Corsi, Davide De Marchi, Eugenio Miglioranza, Giuliana Lista, Ferdinando Daniele Vitelli, Francesca Simonetti, Gian Maria Busetto, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Martina Maggi, Filippo Marino, Giannicola Genovese, Roberto Falabella, Angelo Porreca |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2024.
All research outputs
#20,884,635
of 26,530,858 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Urology
#68
of 162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,642
of 326,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Urology
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,530,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 162 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,328 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.