The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A statistical analysis and comparison of the fine structures of the ion upflow associated with the double-peak subauroral ion drift
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, October 2023
|
DOI | 10.3389/fspas.2023.1254243 |
Authors |
Qiang Zhang, De-Sheng Han, Shang-Chun Teng, Zhi-Wei Wang, Q.-H. Zhang, Zan-Yang Xing, Yong Wang, Yu-Zhang Ma |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 50% |
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 October 2023.
All research outputs
#17,465,866
of 25,621,213 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
#651
of 1,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,890
of 358,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences
#13
of 66 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,621,213 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 66 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.