↓ Skip to main content

The validity and reliability of a hydraulic resistance device for assessing resisted sprint time

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The validity and reliability of a hydraulic resistance device for assessing resisted sprint time
Published in
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fspor.2024.1386882
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matic Sašek, Oskar Cvjetičanin, Nejc Šarabon

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2024.
All research outputs
#21,486,842
of 26,371,446 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
#1,417
of 1,876 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,136
of 139,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,371,446 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,876 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,585 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.