↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of LGBTQ+ identities and topics in sport leadership

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of LGBTQ+ identities and topics in sport leadership
Published in
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fspor.2024.1414404
Pubmed ID
Authors

Colleen S. O’Connell, Anna Bottino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2024.
All research outputs
#8,904,570
of 26,561,164 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
#817
of 1,920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,499
of 303,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
#21
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,561,164 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.