The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evidence Synthesis as the Basis for Decision Analysis: A Method of Selecting the Best Agricultural Practices for Multiple Ecosystem Services
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsufs.2019.00083 |
| Authors |
Gorm E. Shackelford, Rodd Kelsey, William J. Sutherland, Christina M. Kennedy, Stephen A. Wood, Sasha Gennet, Daniel S. Karp, Claire Kremen, Nathaniel E. Seavy, Julie A. Jedlicka, Kelly Gravuer, Sara M. Kross, Deborah A. Bossio, Andrés Muñoz-Sáez, Deirdre G. LaHue, Kelly Garbach, Lawrence D. Ford, Mark Felice, Mark D. Reynolds, Devii R. Rao, Kathleen Boomer, Gretchen LeBuhn, Lynn V. Dicks |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 11% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Kenya | 1 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 18 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 50% |
| Scientists | 13 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 99 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 28 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Professor | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 19 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,995,063
of 23,166,665 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
#199
of 1,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,979
of 353,324 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
#12
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,166,665 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,324 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.