↓ Skip to main content

Long Term Comparison of Talc- and Peat-Based Phytobeneficial Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas synxantha Bioformulations for Promoting Plant Growth

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long Term Comparison of Talc- and Peat-Based Phytobeneficial Pseudomonas fluorescens and Pseudomonas synxantha Bioformulations for Promoting Plant Growth
Published in
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fsufs.2020.602911
Authors

Amy Novinscak, Martin Filion

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 39 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 18%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 21 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Engineering 2 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#20,672,155
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
#1,129
of 1,775 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#432,997
of 508,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
#77
of 110 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,775 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 110 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.