The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Utilization of marine diatom Thalassiosira weissflogii as a feed additive in seawater-tolerant Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus, Linnaeus 1758) strain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsufs.2022.1052951 |
| Authors |
Fredson H. Huervana, Cleresa S. Dionela, Eirene Dorothy S. de la Torre, Carmelo S. del Castillo, Rex Ferdinand M. Traifalgar |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 30% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,630,209
of 26,528,445 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
#466
of 2,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,337
of 498,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems
#28
of 197 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,528,445 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,998 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 498,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 197 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.