↓ Skip to main content

Current Concepts in the Management of Necrotizing Fasciitis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#16 of 3,934)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
8 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
9 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
323 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
439 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Current Concepts in the Management of Necrotizing Fasciitis
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2014.00036
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evangelos P. Misiakos, George Bagias, Paul Patapis, Dimitrios Sotiropoulos, Prodromos Kanavidis, Anastasios Machairas

Abstract

Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a severe, rare, potentially lethal soft tissue infection that develops in the scrotum and perineum, the abdominal wall, or the extremities. The infection progresses rapidly, and septic shock may ensue; hence, the mortality rate is high (median mortality 32.2%). Prognosis becomes poorer in the presence of co-morbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, immunosuppression, chronic alcohol disease, chronic renal failure, and liver cirrhosis. NF is classified into four types, depending on microbiological findings. Most cases are polymicrobial, classed as type I. The clinical status of the patient varies from erythema, swelling, and tenderness in the early stage to skin ischemia with blisters and bullae in the advanced stage of infection. In its fulminant form, the patient is critically ill with signs and symptoms of severe septic shock and multiple organ dysfunction. The clinical condition is the most important clue for diagnosis. However, in equivocal cases, the diagnosis and severity of the infection can be secured with laboratory-based scoring systems, such as the laboratory risk indicator for necrotizing fasciitis score or Fournier's gangrene severity index score, especially in regard to Fournier's gangrene. Computed tomography or ultrasonography can be helpful, but definitive diagnosis is attained by exploratory surgery at the infected sites. Management of the infection begins with broad-spectrum antibiotics, but early and aggressive drainage and meticulous debridement constitute the mainstay of treatment. Postoperative management of the surgical wound is also important for the patient's survival, along with proper nutrition. The vacuum-assisted closure system has proved to be helpful in wound management, with its combined benefits of continuous cleansing of the wound and the formation of granulation tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 439 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 428 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 79 18%
Student > Postgraduate 60 14%
Other 44 10%
Student > Master 40 9%
Researcher 33 8%
Other 64 15%
Unknown 119 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 232 53%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 2%
Other 20 5%
Unknown 132 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 85. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2024.
All research outputs
#500,001
of 25,388,353 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#16
of 3,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,970
of 262,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,388,353 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,934 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,425 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.