The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: Current Insights in Diagnosis and Treatment
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00004 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lucas E. Matthyssens, David Creytens, Wim P. Ceelen |
Abstract |
Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLS) is a rare, biologically heterogeneous tumor that present considerable challenges due to its size and deep location. As a consequence, the majority of patients with high-grade RLS will develop locally recurrent disease following surgery, and this constitutes the cause of death in most patients. Here, we review current insights and controversies regarding histology, molecular biology, extent of surgery, (neo)adjuvant treatment, and systemic treatment including novel targeted agents in RLS. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 109 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 20 | 18% |
Researcher | 18 | 16% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
Student > Master | 8 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 15% |
Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 57 | 51% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 4% |
Unknown | 31 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2016.
All research outputs
#14,214,773
of 22,788,370 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#434
of 2,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,344
of 357,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,788,370 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,838 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.