↓ Skip to main content

Mechanical Ventricular Assistance as Destination Therapy for End-Stage Heart Failure: Has it Become a First Line Therapy?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mechanical Ventricular Assistance as Destination Therapy for End-Stage Heart Failure: Has it Become a First Line Therapy?
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, August 2015
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Massimo Bonacchi, Guy Harmelin, Marco Bugetti, Guido Sani

Abstract

Patients with end-stage heart failure have poor quality of life and prognosis. Therapeutic options are scarce and are not available for all. Only few patients can be transplanted every year. Several medical and surgical strategies have shown limited ability to influence prognosis and quality of life. In the past years, technological progress has realized devices capable of providing appropriate hemodynamic stabilization and recovery of secondary organ failure. Recently, these devices have been assessed as definitive treatment for patients who do not qualify for transplantation or/and instead to transplantation ("destination therapy"). This indication is increasingly considered following the results of newest clinical study reporting long-term survival without device correlated adverse events using last generation devices, and acceptable quality of life. The current knowledge about destination therapy and some original data from the DAVID Study (an Italian multicenter prospective study designed to evaluate the patient's survival rate and quality of life of patients implanted with these new devices as long-term support or destination therapy) are summarized herein. -End-stage heart failure (NYHA class IV or stage D) is a vastly growing problem, with a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options.-Heart Transplantation is nowadays the "gold standard" treatment albeit its inability to serve to the current demand let alone the future one.-The REMATCH study has demonstrated that first generation implantable devices, even with their high number of complications (infectious and thromboembolic events), allowed an improvement of quality and duration of life compared to medical therapy. Further studies have shown that the evolution of VAD technology has reduced device-related complications and consequently improved survival and quality of life of patients with results, according to some authors, similar to cardiac transplantation at least at 2 years from the implantation.-Biotechnology advancements have led to the creation of a new generation of implantable mechanical assist devices: the continuous-flow rotary pumps. Recently entered into clinical use, they seem to represent a promising solution to end -stage-heart failure allowing long-term assistance and an adequate standard of living (Destination Therapy/Bridge to Life).-The DAVID Study, an Italian multicenter prospective study, reports encouraging results in terms of late outcome and quality of life in patients implanted with newest continuous-flow devices as destination therapy. More and more numerous studies are needed to confirm our initial data and for laying the foundations for this new therapeutic frontier face to cardiac transplantation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 2%
Unknown 40 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 8 20%
Unknown 6 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Engineering 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Mathematics 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2015.
All research outputs
#18,420,033
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#918
of 2,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,802
of 263,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#9
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,858 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,982 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.