↓ Skip to main content

Advents in the Diagnosis and Management of Ischemic Colitis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, September 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advents in the Diagnosis and Management of Ischemic Colitis
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, September 2017
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2017.00047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Evangelos P. Misiakos, Dimitrios Tsapralis, Theodore Karatzas, Irene Lidoriki, Dimitrios Schizas, George S. Sfyroeras, Konstantinos G. Moulakakis, Chrysostomos Konstantos, Anastasios Machairas

Abstract

Ischemic colitis (IC) is a common type of ischemic insult, resulting from decreased arterial blood flow to the colon. This disease can be caused from either atherosclerotic occlusive vascular disease or non-occlusive disease. The aim of this study is to present the diagnostic methodology and management of this severe disease based on current literature. A literature search has been done including articles referring to modern diagnosis and management of IC. IC is usually a transient disease, but it can also cause gangrene of the colon, requiring emergency surgical exploration. Diagnosis is troublesome and is based on imaging examinations, mainly computerized tomography, which in association with colonoscopy can delineate the distribution pattern and severity of disease. The majority of patients with mild disease have usually complete clinical recovery within a short period. The severe forms of the disease carry high morbidity and mortality rates and prompt surgical intervention is the only way to improve the associated severe prognosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 15%
Student > Bachelor 9 15%
Student > Postgraduate 7 12%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 14 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,266,531
of 23,001,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#97
of 2,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,353
of 315,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,001,641 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,974 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.