The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The Role of Lymph Node Dissection in the Treatment of Bladder Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, October 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00062 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Francesco Cattaneo, Giovanni Motterle, Filiberto Zattoni, Alessandro Morlacco, Fabrizio Dal Moro |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 17% |
Paraguay | 1 | 17% |
Italy | 1 | 17% |
Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 6 | 25% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 17% |
Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
Researcher | 2 | 8% |
Professor | 2 | 8% |
Other | 3 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 42% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 9 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#6,434,537
of 23,106,390 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#227
of 3,048 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,340
of 344,568 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#6
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,106,390 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,048 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,568 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.