The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Innovative Technology System to Prevent Wrong Site Surgery and Capture Near Misses: A Multi-Center Review of 487 Cases
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, October 2020
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2020.563337 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David M. Gloystein, Bradley A. Heiges, David G. Schwartz, John G. DeVine, Deborah Spratt |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 11% |
Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Engineering | 1 | 4% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 17 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2021.
All research outputs
#3,323,598
of 23,253,955 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#115
of 3,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,089
of 420,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,253,955 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,538 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.