The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tips and Tricks to Improve Ergonomics, Efficacy, Versatility, and Overcome Limitations of Micro Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2021.668928 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarvajit Biligere, Chin-Tiong Heng, Cecilia Cracco, Reshma Mangat, Chloe Shu-Hui Ong, Karthik Thandapani, Takaaki Inoue, Kemal Sarica, Ravindra B. Sabnis, Mahesh Desai, Cesare Scoffone, Vineet Gauhar |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 25% |
| Nicaragua | 1 | 13% |
| Turkey | 1 | 13% |
| Argentina | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Singapore | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 2 | 22% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 44% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2021.
All research outputs
#5,785,942
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#195
of 3,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,478
of 445,351 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#13
of 157 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,351 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 157 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.