The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ideal Anatomical Landmark Points for Thoracic Esophagus Segmentation in the Chinese Population
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2021.729694 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Di Lu, Xiuyu Ji, Jintao Zhan, Jianxue Zhai, Tingxiao Fang, Siyang Feng, Xiguang Liu, Lin Yu, Zhiming Chen, Zhizhi Wang, Xuanzhen Wu, Sue Liu, Hua Wu, Kaican Cai |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2021.
All research outputs
#20,184,694
of 22,699,621 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,358
of 2,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#405,685
of 496,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#89
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,699,621 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,789 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 496,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.