↓ Skip to main content

“Non-Triangle Plane” Surgical Technique of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Atypical Segmentectomy for Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Early Experience

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Non-Triangle Plane” Surgical Technique of Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery Atypical Segmentectomy for Stage IA Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Early Experience
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2021.731283
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Zhou, Jun Qian, Wentao Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2021.
All research outputs
#14,555,398
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#465
of 3,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,718
of 439,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#28
of 268 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 268 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.