↓ Skip to main content

Intravesical Chemohyperthermia vs. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Instillation for Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Intravesical Chemohyperthermia vs. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin Instillation for Intermediate- and High-Risk Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2021.775527
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hongda Zhao, Vinson Wai-Shun Chan, Daniele Castellani, Erica On-Ting Chan, William Lay Keat Ong, Qiang Peng, Marco Moschini, Wojciech Krajewski, Benjamin Pradere, Chi-Fai Ng, Dmitry Enikeev, Nikhil Vasdev, Gokhan Ekin, Alejandro Sousa, Juan Leon, Felix Guerrero-Ramos, Wei-Shen Tan, John Kelly, Shahrokh F. Shariat, J. Alfred Witjes, Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 9%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 52%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 4%
Unknown 14 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,787,890
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#195
of 3,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,711
of 510,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#15
of 253 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,161 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 510,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 253 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.