↓ Skip to main content

One-and-a-half nostril versus binostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach to the pituitary adenomas: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
One-and-a-half nostril versus binostril endoscopic transsphenoidal approach to the pituitary adenomas: A prospective randomized controlled trial
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1007883
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junhao Zhu, Guodao Wen, Chao Tang, Zixiang Cong, Xiangming Cai, Jin Yang, Chiyuan Ma

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Unknown 2 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Unknown 3 60%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2022.
All research outputs
#15,514,052
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#711
of 3,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,823
of 435,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#67
of 448 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,899 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 448 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.