The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A safer and more practical tracheotomy in invasive mechanical ventilated patients with COVID-19: A quality improvement study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1018637 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai Kang, Junfeng Wang, Xue Du, Nana Li, Songgen Jin, Yuanyuan Ji, Xinjia Liu, Pengfei Chen, Chuangshi Yue, Jihan Wu, Xintong Wang, Yujia Tang, Qiqi Lai, Baitao Lu, Yang Gao, Kaijiang Yu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2022.
All research outputs
#20,279,276
of 24,932,434 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,122
of 3,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,166
of 435,528 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#98
of 324 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,434 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,804 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,528 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 324 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.