↓ Skip to main content

Treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy using ACDF or a combination of ACDF and ACCF

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, September 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Treatment of three-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy using ACDF or a combination of ACDF and ACCF
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, September 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1021643
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoming Tian, Hongwei Zhao, Felicity Y. Han, Samuel Rudd, Zhaohui Li, Wenyuan Ding, Sidong Yang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#20,068,868
of 24,667,989 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,084
of 3,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,336
of 396,257 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#100
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,667,989 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,753 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 396,257 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.