↓ Skip to main content

Perioperative systemic inflammation in lung cancer surgery: Just an epiphenomenon or a potential therapeutic target?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perioperative systemic inflammation in lung cancer surgery: Just an epiphenomenon or a potential therapeutic target?
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1045388
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico Tacconi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2022.
All research outputs
#16,899,948
of 24,849,927 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#799
of 3,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,674
of 435,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#60
of 370 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,849,927 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,795 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 370 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.