↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Improving voice outcomes after thyroid surgery and ultrasound-guided ablation procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, December 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Improving voice outcomes after thyroid surgery and ultrasound-guided ablation procedures
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, December 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1064768
Pubmed ID
Authors

Che-Wei Wu, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Kyung Tae

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2022.
All research outputs
#18,254,031
of 23,445,423 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#818
of 3,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#285,250
of 440,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#66
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,445,423 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,230 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.