The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modified lumbar foraminoplasty using a power-aided reciprocating burr for percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy: A technical note and clinical report
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.1091187 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yingbo Wang, Jian Wu, Tengyu Wang, Yaoyao Liu, Mei Jiang, Zhong Wang, Rui Chao, Peng Liu, Jungang Pu, Weili Fan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2023.
All research outputs
#20,461,262
of 25,145,981 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,157
of 3,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346,932
of 472,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#83
of 417 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,145,981 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,872 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 417 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.