You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Laparoscopy vs. Laparotomy for the Management of Abdominal Trauma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.817134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jianjun Wang, Liangwang Cheng, Jing Liu, Binyin Zhang, Weijun Wang, Wenxin Zhu, Yan Guo, Chuanfei Bao, Yunli Hu, Shanxin Qi, Kai Wang, Shuguang Zhao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Researcher | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 20 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 33% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 22 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,200,593
of 23,376,718 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#816
of 3,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,335
of 440,444 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#116
of 476 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,376,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,199 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,444 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 476 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.