The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Suitable Electrode Choice for Robotic-Assisted Cochlear Implant Surgery: A Systematic Literature Review of Manual Electrode Insertion Adverse Events
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.823219 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Van de Heyning, Peter Roland, Luis Lassaletta, Sumit Agrawal, Marcus Atlas, Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner, Kevin Brown, Marco Caversaccio, Stefan Dazert, Wolfgang Gstoettner, Rudolf Hagen, Abdulrahman Hagr, Greg Eigner Jablonski, Mohan Kameswaran, Vladislav Kuzovkov, Martin Leinung, Yongxin Li, Andreas Loth, Astrid Magele, Robert Mlynski, Joachim Mueller, Lorne Parnes, Andreas Radeloff, Chris Raine, Gunesh Rajan, Joachim Schmutzhard, Henryk Skarzynski, Piotr H. Skarzynski, Georg Sprinzl, Hinrich Staecker, Timo Stöver, Dayse Tavora-Viera, Vedat Topsakal, Shin-Ichi Usami, Vincent Van Rompaey, Nora M. Weiss, Wilhelm Wimmer, Mario Zernotti, Javier Gavilan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Researcher | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 24 | 65% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 6 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 62% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#20,910,150
of 23,538,320 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,479
of 3,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#361,385
of 442,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#226
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,538,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,241 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.