↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Efficacy of Different Thoracoscopic Surgeries for Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Efficacy of Different Thoracoscopic Surgeries for Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.842047
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tao Wang, Xi Liu, Lei Chen, Tao Liang, Xiaokuang Ning

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2022.
All research outputs
#18,860,161
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#985
of 3,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#400,093
of 554,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#129
of 429 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 554,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 429 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.