The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Large Cavernous Sinus Giant Cell Tumor Invading Clivus and Sphenoid Sinus Masquerading as Meningioma: A Case Report and Literature Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.861739 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shasha Hu, Shaowen Cheng, Yu Wu, Yanyan Wang, XinNian Li, Jiaxuan Zheng, Jiao Li, Lei Peng, Jian Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2022.
All research outputs
#18,311,819
of 23,530,272 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#822
of 3,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,949
of 442,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#129
of 511 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,530,272 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,288 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 511 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.