The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical utility and future direction of speaking valve: A review
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, September 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.913147 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Suna Lian, Liying Teng, Zhi Mao, Hongying Jiang |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Decision Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2023.
All research outputs
#4,522,816
of 24,138,997 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#169
of 3,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,809
of 420,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#18
of 441 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,138,997 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,636 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 441 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.