The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparative Learning Curves of Microscope Versus Exoscope: A Preclinical Randomized Crossover Noninferiority Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, June 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.920252 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Hugo Layard Horsfall, Zeqian Mao, Chan Hee Koh, Danyal Z. Khan, William Muirhead, Danail Stoyanov, Hani J. Marcus |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 12% |
Other | 2 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 12% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 29% |
Engineering | 2 | 12% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
Chemical Engineering | 1 | 6% |
Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,950,934
of 22,818,766 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#393
of 2,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,652
of 440,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#55
of 444 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,818,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,858 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 444 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.