↓ Skip to main content

A rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in adults: Ileal duplication with ulceration: A case report and review of literature

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A rare cause of gastrointestinal bleeding in adults: Ileal duplication with ulceration: A case report and review of literature
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.927288
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lingli Li, Hongping Li, Xiaoyan Chen, Jin Yao, Rui Xie, Hong Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2022.
All research outputs
#20,761,844
of 23,365,820 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,461
of 3,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,399
of 434,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#180
of 459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,365,820 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,194 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.