The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Development and validation of a competing risk model for second primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: A population-based study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.934148 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lishan Song, Chaojie Xu, Tong Zhang, Shengyang Chen, Zhigang Shi, Shuiquan Hu, Bingbing Cheng, Hao Tong, Guangkun Wei, Xiaoyong Li |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2022.
All research outputs
#19,302,701
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#873
of 3,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,254
of 420,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#85
of 436 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,912 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 436 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.