↓ Skip to main content

Resection of cervical extra-intraspinal neuromas through the enlarged intervertebral foramen: Results in 34 case series patients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Resection of cervical extra-intraspinal neuromas through the enlarged intervertebral foramen: Results in 34 case series patients
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, April 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2022.945857
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuan Chang, Xiao-Ming Che, Ming-Guang Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2023.
All research outputs
#23,307,051
of 25,971,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#2,092
of 4,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#359,664
of 419,250 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#164
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,971,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,015 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 419,250 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.