The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Does the application of expandable cages in TLIF provide improved clinical and radiological results compared to static cages? A meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2022.949938 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guang-Xun Lin, Jin-Sung Kim, Vit Kotheeranurak, Chien-Min Chen, Bao-Shan Hu, Gang Rui |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 25% |
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 21% |
| Engineering | 2 | 8% |
| Materials Science | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 August 2022.
All research outputs
#15,605,323
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#722
of 3,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,348
of 434,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#81
of 459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,107 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.