↓ Skip to main content

New improved incision-tubing approach for bronchoesophageal Fistula with mediastinal abscess after esophagectomy: A case report

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, March 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
New improved incision-tubing approach for bronchoesophageal Fistula with mediastinal abscess after esophagectomy: A case report
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, March 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1100264
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jianwei Cao, Mingfei Geng, Xiaoyu Huang, Changjiang Liu, Hui Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2023.
All research outputs
#23,296,840
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#2,243
of 4,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#365,607
of 426,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#227
of 392 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 392 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.