↓ Skip to main content

A novel auxiliary fixation technique of meshes in intraperitoneal onlay mesh procedures for incisional hernia repair

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A novel auxiliary fixation technique of meshes in intraperitoneal onlay mesh procedures for incisional hernia repair
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1201992
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kunjie Zhang, Jiayu Lin, Lianjin Qin, Leqi Li, Changjun Xia, Jianfang Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2023.
All research outputs
#20,406,629
of 25,081,505 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,146
of 3,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,284
of 362,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#41
of 174 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,081,505 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,936 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 174 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.