The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intraoperative electrophysiological monitoring determines the final electrode position for pallidal stimulation in dystonia patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, May 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1206721 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marek Baláž, Jiří Búřil, Tereza Jurková, Eva Koriťáková, Dušan Hrabovský, Jonáš Kunst, Petra Bártová, Jan Chrastina |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2023.
All research outputs
#19,618,314
of 24,988,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#921
of 3,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,707
of 372,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#33
of 236 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,988,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,812 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 236 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.