↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: New perspectives and innovative techniques in contemporary spine surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: New perspectives and innovative techniques in contemporary spine surgery
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1220181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Ambrosio, Gianluca Vadalà, Fabrizio Russo, Daisuke Sakai, Vincenzo Denaro

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2023.
All research outputs
#20,381,131
of 25,051,161 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,143
of 3,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,370
of 366,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#44
of 195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,051,161 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,841 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.