You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed with AirSeal® system vs. standard insufflator: results from a referral center
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, June 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1220332 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Flavio Forte, Domenico Tripodi, Daniele Pironi, Emanuele Corongiu, Federica Gagliardi, Marco Frisenda, Gaetano Gallo, Antonia Quarantiello, Giuseppe Di Lorenzo, Yuri Cavaleri, Stefano Salciccia, Eleonora Lori, Salvatore Sorrenti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2023.
All research outputs
#20,422,901
of 25,099,766 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,156
of 3,843 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,789
of 358,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#41
of 168 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,099,766 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,843 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,423 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 168 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.