The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging of anal fistulas with scrotal extension: a retrospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Surgery, July 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1224931 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Duc Tan Vo, Truc Thi Thuy Nguyen, Nam Hoang Nguyen, Linh Thi Thuy Nguyen, Thien Thi Thanh Nguyen, Chien Cong Phan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Vietnam | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,745,276
of 26,397,269 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#474
of 4,044 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,034
of 372,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#10
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,397,269 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,044 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,879 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.