↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Current trends in endoscopic thoracic surgery: insights from the XXI SIET national meeting

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Current trends in endoscopic thoracic surgery: insights from the XXI SIET national meeting
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1237928
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federico Raveglia, Franca Melfi, Ugo Cioffi, Filippo Lococo, Sara Ricciardi, Cecilia Pompili, Giuseppe Cardillo

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2023.
All research outputs
#19,999,620
of 24,576,899 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#1,060
of 3,738 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,210
of 349,647 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#26
of 165 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,576,899 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,738 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,647 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 165 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.