↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Alignment options and robotics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) “Alignment, alignment, alignment, but TKA fail mainly for infections and instability”

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Surgery, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Alignment options and robotics in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) “Alignment, alignment, alignment, but TKA fail mainly for infections and instability”
Published in
Frontiers in Surgery, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1247759
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pier Francesco Indelli, Andrea Giordano Salvi, Giuseppe Petralia

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2023.
All research outputs
#15,518,247
of 24,589,002 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Surgery
#510
of 3,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,688
of 342,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Surgery
#10
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,589,002 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,739 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 342,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.